Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Maryland Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1910PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Taylor County. Action by Adolphus Armstrong and others against the Maryland Coal Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

The executory contract, specific execution of which by the Maryland Coal Company is sought by the bill, is covered: First, by the original or option contract of January 31st, 1903, as modified and indorsed thereon January 31st, 1903, executed by [Reefer & Thorn, co-partners, and W. P. Goff and J. W. Brown, as individuals, but in fact as agents for plaintiffs and John T. Me-Graw, and calling for final acceptance on or before February 8th, 1903; second, by the so called acceptance contract executed by the defendant company, by J. E. Knapp, president, under its corporate seal;…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chartiers Block Coal Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
  3. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Watts v. Waddle Ex Rel. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hark v. Mountain Fork Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Clayborn v. Camilla Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Tate v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Chapman v. BranchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Donahue v. RaffertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API