Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Julian

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1946No. 36,600PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was a common law action founded on negligence, to recover damages for personal injuries. The case is here upon appeal by the defendant from orders overruling his demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence and his motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.

The order overruling the motion for a directed verdict requires no discussion. Such an order is not appealable. It is not a final order since it does not determine the cause. Nor is it specifically made appealable by statute, as is a ruling on demurrer, whether the demurrer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Setter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Davis v. JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Gillaspie v. United Iron-works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Farmers Elevator Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  2. Gould v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Moon v. Theo W. Lord, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API