Legal Opinion
In Re Bear
California Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1932No. Docket No. Crim. 3507PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was arrested on November 2, 1931, in Los Angeles, and charged with violation of an act (Stats. 1931, chap. 280, p. 584; 1 Leering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, Act 2214, p. 1035) providing for the inspection and certification of liquid, frozen and dried eggs, and any other egg products. At the time of his arrest he was engaged in the manufacture of a meringue powder, using such egg products imported from without the United States, and failed to comply with the provisions of the act requiring that each-package of his manufactured commodity be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Roberts v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pacific Meat Co., Ltd. v. OtagakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
- Paraco, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.