Legal Opinion

Pacific Meat Co., Ltd. v. Otagaki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1964No. 4331PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MIZUHA, J.

Act 109, S.L.H. 1961, provides that, for the purpose of notifying the consumer as to its geographic origin, no person shall sell or offer to sell uncooked poultry without a label as to its origin.

Plaintiff-appellee, Pacific Meat Co., Ltd., is a wholesaler of food products. Plaintiff-appellee, C. Q. Yee Hop & Co., Ltd., is a retailer of food products. Plaintiffs initially filed a bill in equity to restrain the enforcement of Act 109, S.L.H. 1961 on the ground that it was unconstitutional. That action was dismissed on the basis that plaintiffs had an adequate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mississippi Poultry Association, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Grimm v. Co. Comm'rs of Wash. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Parker v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Strager v. Wayne County Prosecuting AttorneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Kahaikupuna v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API