Legal Opinion

Bush v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 25, 1991No. 89 C 652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Commonwealth Edison Co. (“Edison”) has moved for summary judgment on all three of plaintiff Jay Bush’s causes of action as alleged in his second amended complaint — namely, his assertions of discriminatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (1988) (Count I), discriminatory failure to promote under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988) (Count II), and state statutory and common law retaliation (Count III). For the reasons set forth below, we grant the motion for summary judgment on all three counts.

I.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Buchheit of Sparta, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jay v. Bush v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Johnson v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  4. Campbell v. Fasco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Bush v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API