Bush v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Jay Bush has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend this court’s decision granting defendant Commonwealth Edison Co.’s (“Edison”) motion for summary judgment. That decision, dated November 25, 1991, disposed of Bush’s Title VII discriminatory discharge claim, his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988) discriminatory failure to promote allegation, and his common , law retaliation theory. Bush v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 778 F.Supp. 1436 (N.D.Ill.1991).
Bush now suggests that his § 1981 claim should be reinstated because…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- William O. Mozee, Gregory L. Rankin, Frederick Williams v. American Commercial Marine Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Rivard v. Chicago Fire Fighters Union, Local No. 2Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- United States Steel Credit Union v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wittenberg v. Wheels, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Vondra v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009