Jeffords v. Albemarle Waterworks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at March Term, 1910, of StaNly. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.
1Opinion of the CourtClaek, C. J.
This is an action to recover tbe contract price for boring an artesian well. Tbe plaintiffs alleged that they were wrongfully prevented by tbe defendants from completing tbe contract; but tbe defendants denied this, and alleged that tbe failure of tbe plaintiffs to complete tbe contract was caused by their failure or refusal to use tbe necessary machinery for straightening crooked places in tbe well, caused by tbe drill being deflected by bard rock.
Tbe case was referred to a referee, who adjudged tbe plaintiffs entitled to recover tbe contract price for tbe work actually done up to tbe time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Barnhardt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- S. F. Bowser & Co. v. TarrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Edgerton v. . EdgertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Lewis v. Covington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Dumas v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Grandy v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Lytton Manufacturing Co. v. House Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Sugg v. St. Mary's Oil Engine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.