Legal Opinion
Stokely Bros. Co., Inc. v. Conklin
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 11, 1942No. Docket 139/219PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The question to be determined is one of right to priority in payment as between two interpleading defendants, Mercer Feed Company and the United States of America, Governor of the Farm Credit Administration. A third defendant, G. William Conklin, failed to file an answer or a statement of claim. Moneys have been paid into court by the complainant, Stokely Brothers Company, Inc., and it has been discharged.
The facts have been stipulated. Mr. Conklin in 1940, operated two farms in Burlington County, complainant owned and operated a cannery in Mercer County, and Mercer Feed Company was a dealer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Sullivan v. ViscontiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Structural Gypsum Corp. v. National, C., Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Cumberland National Bank v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
- Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kahn v. RockhillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Adco Service, Inc. v. Graphic Color PlateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Insurance, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Harry C. Steigman Equipment Co. v. Atlantic Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Harry C. Steigman Equipment Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Hotel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955