Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Rockhill

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 26, 1942No. Docket 139/384PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint in this cause was previously scrutinized in the consideration of a motion to strike the answer of the defendants. Kahn v. Rockhill, 131 N.J. Eq. 279; 25 Atl. Rep. 2d 4. The pleadings being thereby exposed to examination, the motion addressed to the answer was denied because it seemed evident that the first alleged cause in the bill failed to exhibit a cause of action maintainable by the complainant as the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Fred Davis Rockhill. It was accordingly announced that a motion would be entertained to strike the first alleged cause from the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Spindle v. ShreveSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Page v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Graves v. GravesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  5. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barrett v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. AdelungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  4. Mey v. MeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Wendell v. Hazel Wood CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API