Kahn v. Rockhill
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The bill of complaint in this cause was previously scrutinized in the consideration of a motion to strike the answer of the defendants. Kahn v. Rockhill, 131 N.J. Eq. 279; 25 Atl. Rep. 2d 4. The pleadings being thereby exposed to examination, the motion addressed to the answer was denied because it seemed evident that the first alleged cause in the bill failed to exhibit a cause of action maintainable by the complainant as the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Fred Davis Rockhill. It was accordingly announced that a motion would be entertained to strike the first alleged cause from the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Spindle v. ShreveSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Page v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Graves v. GravesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barrett v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. AdelungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Mey v. MeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Wendell v. Hazel Wood CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.