Insurance, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.
The central issue on this appeal is whether the District Court erred as a matter of law in determining that an assignment made by one Maynard R. Smith (hereafter Smith), to appellee United States Fidelity and Guaranty» Company (hereafter U.S.F. & G.), entitled it to a fund on deposit in the registry of the District Court representing the fruits of a judgment obtained by Smith against Travelers Indemnity Company (hereafter Travelers), or whether the District Court erred as a matter of law in determining that appellant, Insurance, Inc., is not entitled to said fund under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wally Gray and Maryland Casualty Company, a Corporation, and Northern Commercial Company, a Corporation v. Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Danais v. M. De Matteo Const. Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1952
- Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. of Newark v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Wike v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doherty, Clifford, Steers & Shenfield, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Merck & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Glassman Construction Co., Inc. v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Glassman Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Glassman Construction Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966