Legal Opinion
CASS-WARNER CORPORATION v. Brickman
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 7, 1967No. 370, 371PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
Cass-Warner Corporation brought suit (No. 370) to recover a balance claimed to be due for labor and materials furnished to defendants, Brickmans, for the construction of a marina. Thereafter, the Brickmans brought a counter-suit (No. 371) seeking damages for alleged improper and defective work done by Cass-Warner “under an agreement.” The cases were consolidated for trial by agreement of counsel. Hearing was by court. Findings of fact were made by the trial court applicable to both cases. Each party has appealed, claiming the evidence does not support certain specified findings of fact on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Platt v. WoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Boville v. Dalton Paper MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Chamberlin v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Rioux v. Ryegate Brick Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Forcier v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Marshall Contractors, Inc. v. Brown UniversitySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Pioneer Credit Corporation v. CardenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re HeathSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.