Department of Human Services v. M. H.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Mother and father appeal juvenile court judgments in which the court continued the permanency plan of adoption as to one child, A, and continued the permanency plan of reunification as to another child, V. On appeal, mother and father assert that, in continuing the permanency plan of adoption for A, the juvenile court erred by failing to include on the face of the judgment its determination whether there was any reason under ORS 419B.498(2) to defer the filing of a petition to terminate mother and father’s parental rights, as required by ORS 419B.476(5)(d).1 We agree, and we also conclude…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Department of Human Services v. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Department of Human Services v. W. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Department of Human Services v. H. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019