Department of Human Services v. M. H.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
In this dependency case, the Department of Human Services (DHS) and child, A, appeal a judgment that set aside earlier judgments terminating mother’s and father’s parental rights (TPR judgments). We conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by setting aside the TPR judgments, and, therefore, we affirm.
We begin by recapping the lengthy procedural history of the case. A, now four years old, has been in DHS custody and substitute care since she was two days old. The juvenile court took jurisdiction over A several months after her birth, in September 2010. In July 2011, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Department of Human Services v. A. D. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Dept. of Multnomah County v. FwOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. F. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Department of Human Services v. C. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. S. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Department of Human Services v. T. M. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Department of Human Services v. A. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Department of Human Services v. C. M. E.Clatsop County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Dept. of Human Services v. C. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.