Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. M. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2013No. 110119J; Petition Number 110119J01; A152188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHablock, J.

Mother and father appeal juvenile court judgments in which the court asserted jurisdiction over their daughter, V, and placed her in the custody of the Department of Human Services (DHS) on the ground that child’s condition and circumstances endangered her welfare. Mother asserts on appeal that the juvenile court lacked personal jurisdiction over V and also lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. Both parents contend that the court erred in concluding that child’s condition and circumstances endangered her welfare. We conclude that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. C. Z.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Department of Human Services v. N. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Department of Human Services v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Department of Human Services v. G. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Department of Human Services v. A. R. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. J. E. D. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Department of Human Services v. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. K. C. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API