United States v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Before the Court is [5] the government's motion for a protective order governing the disclosure and use of body-worn camera footage in this case. For the reasons that follow, the government's motion will be denied, and the parties will be directed to confer and submit a proposed order that is consistent with this Opinion.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Jimmy Lee Johnson, Jr., was arrested in April 2018 and charged with one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See Indictment [ECF No. 1]; Arrest Warrant [ECF No. 2].…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. WechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fraternal Order of Police-Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Johnson v. DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- United States v. Concord Management and Consulting LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.