Legal Opinion
United States v. Kingsbury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 4, 2018No. Criminal Case No. 18-109 (JDB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge *159In United States v. Johnson, 314 F.Supp.3d 248 (D.D.C. 2018), this Court rejected a motion for a protective order governing body-worn camera materials that was materially indistinguishable from [14] the government's motion for a protective order governing the body-worn camera footage at issue in this case and substantially similar to [15] the government's motion for a protective order governing certain police personnel data. Largely for the reasons given in Johnson-which are summarized briefly below-the Court will grant the government's motions for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Fraternal Order of Police-Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Johnson v. DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- United States v. DixonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States v. ZabavskyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022