Bomser v. Moyle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The appeal from the order dismissing the original complaint must be dismissed as moot since an amended complaint was served. Nonetheless, for purposes of background, a brief discussion will be had of that original complaint.
In the original complaint, plaintiff Bomser sought to recover from defendant Moyle upon a written finder’s agreement. It was the plaintiff’s contention that an “undated document” sent to him by the defendant constituted a written agreement. However, Special Term correctly *203found that this unsigned document did not reflect any assent by the parties to a…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shapiro v. Dictaphone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Shields v. School of Law of Hofstra UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Harris v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Berdych v. Bell Aerospace Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Caniglia v. Chicago Tribune-New York News Syndicate Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Sud v. SudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ChipetineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- McEntee v. Van Cleef & Arpels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Copeland v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.