Legal Opinion
McEntee v. Van Cleef & Arpels, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.), entered on August 24, 1989, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff Charles McEntee, a former salesman and sales manager employed by defendant Van Cleef & Arpels, a New York corporation and retail establishment engaged in the fine jewelry business, commenced this action seeking, in four causes of action of an amended complaint, monetary damages arising from the plaintiff’s discharge.
Upon review of the record, we find that the IAS…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ingle v. Glamore Motor Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bomser v. MoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arbeeny v. Kennedy Executive Search, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Frishberg v. Esprit De Corp., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Yudell v. Ann Israel & AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- UWC, Inc. v. Eagle Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Brooks v. Blue Cross of Northeastern New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.