Legal Opinion
Handwerker v. at & T Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 2002No. 00 CIV. 4030PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
By Decision and Order dated September 30, 2002 (the “Decision”) 1 the Court granted defendant AT & T’s motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d) for the repeated failure of plaintiff Rene S. Hand-werker (“Handwerker”) to comply with orders of this Court directing discovery. Handwerker now moves for an Order pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3 granting reargument or reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Reconsideration of a court’s previous order is an “extraordinary remedy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Health Management Systems, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lichtenberg v. Besicorp Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sanchez v. RodriguezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Local 100, Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sentry Insurance A Mutual Co. v. Brand Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Flores v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Legrande v. AdeccoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.