Flores v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Seibel, U.S.D.J.
Before the Court are the motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 37), and motion for sanctions, (Doc. 31), of Defendant Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy"). For the reasons stated below, both motions are GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts set forth below are taken from the parties' Local Rule 56.1 Statements and supporting materials, and are undisputed unless otherwise noted.
Defendant operates the Indian Point Energy Center ("IPEC"), a power generating nuclear facility located in Buchanan, New York, under a license issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC").…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carmody v. New York UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Christopher M. Lyn v. Mount Saint Mary College, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Conquistador v. HurdleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- De Jesus-Hall v. New York State Unified Court SystemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Drita Haxhijaj-Sayegh v. The City of Yonkers, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.