Fiveland v. Bollig & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
Blaine and Arlene Fiveland, husband and wife, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing their personal injury claims against respondents as barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat. § 541.051 (1988). The trial court determined that Blaine Fiveland’s injuries arose out of the defective and unsafe condition, of an improvement to realty and that, therefore, the Fivelands had to bring their actions within two years after discovery of those injuries. On appeal, the Fivelands claim (1) although the improvement to realty may have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Appletree Square 1 Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Brandt v. Hallwood Management Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Busch v. Model Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.