Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoffa
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1967No. Nos. 16991-16994PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
These appeals are from an order of the District Court denying Appellants’ third motion for a new trial. Like the second one, it was also based on alleged newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered evidence does not relate to the guilt or innocence of Appellants. The motion was not filed until nearly eighteen months after their conviction and one month after we had affirmed. United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied February 27, 1967, 386 U.S. 951, 87 S.Ct. 970, 17 L.Ed.2d 880…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sca Services, Inc. v. Hon. Robert D. Morgan, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paul O'DellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.