Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul O'Dell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1986No. 85-1414PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Paul O’Dell appeals from the decision of the district court denying his motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

On February 10, 1983, defendant Paul O’Dell was indicted by a federal grand jury on one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was also indicted on four counts of aiding and abetting another in the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

A…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rodic v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Harry Christian (84-5843), Joe L. Davis (85-5005/85-5346)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Jose Hector Santos VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Roger D. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Paul Lochmondy (88-2049) Charles Ludlow (88-2134)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API