United States v. Paul O'Dell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Paul O’Dell appeals from the decision of the district court denying his motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
On February 10, 1983, defendant Paul O’Dell was indicted by a federal grand jury on one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was also indicted on four counts of aiding and abetting another in the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
A…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rodic v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harry Christian (84-5843), Joe L. Davis (85-5005/85-5346)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jose Hector Santos VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Roger D. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Paul Lochmondy (88-2049) Charles Ludlow (88-2134)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.