State v. Cavanaugh
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The State appeals from a ruling of the Superior Court {Gray, J.) granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. The trial court ruled that police officers’ failure to have a previously issued search warrant present upon the commencement of a search violated the defendant’s constitutional rights. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.
The essential facts in this case are not disputed. On the evening of November 5, 1991, the Salem police planned and implemented a “controlled buy” of $50 worth of marijuana from the defendant at the *194defendant’s apartment. Several detectives maintained…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Russell Bonner, United States of America v. Wayne BonnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- State v. PellicciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CaneloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State of Iowa v. Lee Allen BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State v. BerrocalesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Welzenbach v. PowersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997