Legal Opinion
State v. Berrocales
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 7, 1996No. 94-611PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendant, Claudio Berrocales, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell. See RSA 318-B:2, :26 (1995). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Manias, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of his apartment by a probation officer. We affirm.
*263In September . 1992, the defendant was sentenced to two years probation after pleading guilty to the charge of assault with a deadly weapon. At that time he agreed to a number of conditions of probation, including a term stating, “I will submit to reasonable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. James William GiannettaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James S. Hill, Jr., James HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. EllsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. McKinnon-AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. PerfettoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State of New Hampshire v. Heidi BrouilletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.