Legal Opinion

Tee v. Albertsons, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1992No. WCB 88-11538; CA A64558; SC S38437PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*635PETERSON, J.

Here, an injured worker has been found capable of part-time work in an occupation, but her earnings would be approximately one-third of her pre-injury wages. She claims that her earnings are so greatly reduced as to entitle her to a permanent total disability (PTD) award. ORS 656.206(l)(a) provides:

“ ‘Permanent total disability’ means the loss, including preexisting disability, of use or function of any scheduled or unscheduled portion of the body which permanently incapacitates the worker from regularly performing work at a gainful and suitable occupation. As used in this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Frame v. Crown ZellerbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. In re Frame v. Crown ZellerbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. v. Larry WoodCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API