Legal Opinion

In re Frame v. Crown Zellerbach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 1983No. WCB Case 80-07617; CA A24057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

We grant employer’s petition for reconsideration, because it has been brought to our attention that we did not have all of the exhibits before us when the case was originally considered. We now have received and reviewed the exhibits. We do not find it necessary to change our previous decision, in which we held that claimant had proven that he is entitled to a program of rehabilitation.

Claimant, before his injury, had held a job paying substantially more than the minimum wage. Under the circumstances of this case, we concluded that there is no compelled conclusion that a claimant who has been…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tee v. Albertsons, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API