Legal Opinion

State v. Rhoiney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 30, 2021No. 121159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,159 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANDRE CLARK RHOINEY JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6820(e)(3) does not require an appellate court to review an identical offense argument for the first time on appeal. Appeal from Shawnee District Court; DAVID B. DEBENHAM, judge. Opinion filed December 30, 2021. Affirmed. Michelle A. Davis, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Michael J. Duenes, assistant solicitor general, argued the cause, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
  5. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API