State v. White
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,039 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOHNNY C. WHITE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When a district court excludes evidence at trial, the party seeking to admit that evidence must make a sufficient substantive proffer to preserve the issue for appeal. A formal proffer is not required, and we may review the claim as long as an adequate record is made in a manner that discloses the evidence sought to be introduced. The purpose of such a proffer is two-fold—first, to procedurally preserve the issue for review, and second, to substantively…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- In re A.K.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.