Legal Opinion

State v. McKenzie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1988No. C87-02-30673; CA A44952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in failing to instruct the jury properly. We affirm.

Officer Watson received bail for the release of a detainee named Cannady, who was in the courthouse booking facility. Watson called the booking facility and told Officer Hall that Cannady’s bail had been posted and that Cannady should be brought to the detention center for release. Hall told Officer Taber to get Cannady. By mistake, Taber got defendant. Officer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. WolfsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WolfsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API