Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Baker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1927No. 15302PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
The defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs and the plaintiff in error as the defendant, as the parties appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs brought this suit against the defendant on a tourist’s policy of insurance to recover the value of a diamond and platinum bowknot brooch which they allege was of the value of $800. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount sued for. Defendant appeals.
The policy sued on insures on baggage and personal effects of the plaintiffs and members of their family from the time the property insured…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pitcher v. . HennesseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- McFetridge v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Pecos Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Republic Insurance Co., Dallas, Texas v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. DickasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.