Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dickason
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Vice Chief Justice:
Action was instituted on an insurance policy by defendant in error as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, defendant insurer to recover the value, within policy limitation, of personal property assertedly stolen in a burglary. A jury was waived and the action tried to the court who entered judgment for $2,400.00 in favor of plaintiff.
Defendant alleges error in three propositions on appeal. The first proposition contains three specifications of error: overruling defendant’s demurrer (to the evidence) ; in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict (motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Verschoyle v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Connelly v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Nash v. HillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Propst v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Austin v. Wilkerson, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Nail Ex Rel. Nail v. Oklahoma Children's Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.