Legal Opinion
Saylor v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 13, 1992No. 2 CA-IC 91-0049PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Chief Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case, the employee challenges the finding of the administrative law judge (AU) that her claim for compensation was untimely and that the untimeliness was unexcused.
While employed as a custodian for the University of Arizona, Guadalupe Saylor was injured on July 18, 1989, when she slipped while stepping into a bathtub to clean a shower wall. She reported the accident to her supervisor and went home. On July 20, 1989, she went to the Urgent Care Center at Thomas-Davis Clinic complaining of right hip, knee, and foot pain. The physician…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- M. M. Sundt Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Mofford v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Bird v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012