Legal Opinion

M. M. Sundt Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1979No. 14483-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Respondent employee, Neftale C. Herran, has operated heavy construction machinery for 35 years. During the 12 to 15 years prior to 1977, he was employed by petitioner M. M. Sundt Construction Co., working primarily on highway and street construction. The noise level at such job sites was of such magnitude that hand signals were often essentially the only means of communication.

Approximately 15 years ago, respondent began to notice a ringing in his ears which would disappear within an hour after leaving work. In late 1977, while receiving ultrasonic sound treatment for a back…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helmericks v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. McCormick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Miller v. Lake Area HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Vu v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API