Berger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C. J.
*486Plaintiff Douglas Berger prevailed in this action to recover personal injury protection (PIP) and uninsured motorist (UM) benefits under an automobile insurance policy with defendant State Farm. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rejecting his request for attorney fees under ORS 742.061(1), after the trial court concluded that State Farm had complied with the "safe-harbor" provisions, ORS 742.061(2) (PIP) ; ORS 742.061(3) (UM), on each claim. We review the trial court's ruling relating to attorney fees for legal error, Robinson v. Tri-Met , 277 Or. App. 60, 61, 370 P.3d 864 (2016), rev. den. ,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Kiryuta v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Spearman v. Progressive Classic Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berger v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Thoens v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022