Legal Opinion

Berger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2018No. A160966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C. J.

*486Plaintiff Douglas Berger prevailed in this action to recover personal injury protection (PIP) and uninsured motorist (UM) benefits under an automobile insurance policy with defendant State Farm. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rejecting his request for attorney fees under ORS 742.061(1), after the trial court concluded that State Farm had complied with the "safe-harbor" provisions, ORS 742.061(2) (PIP) ; ORS 742.061(3) (UM), on each claim. We review the trial court's ruling relating to attorney fees for legal error, Robinson v. Tri-Met , 277 Or. App. 60, 61, 370 P.3d 864 (2016), rev. den. ,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kiryuta v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Spearman v. Progressive Classic Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berger v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Thoens v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API