Legal Opinion

Yule v. Fell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

'Appeal from Oedar District Gourt. — IIon. W. N. Treioiiler, Judge. Action in equity for specific performance of agreement to convey land. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

frauds?sai! p!uormanacre. Much of the testimony offered by plaintiff was objected to on the trial, but the case is here for trial de novoj and we think it unnecessary to discuss the alleged errors. After excluding all the evidence which might fairly be held objectionable, there is enough left in the record to show the following facts: In February, 1902, the’defendant Wendell Fell purchased a forty acre tract of land in Cedar county, Iowa, from one Britcher. The plaintiff, Yule, cjaimed to have leased the land from Britcher for the year mentioned. Shortly after the purchase by the defendant he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Frey v. VanderhoofWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Ingersoll v. TruebodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Buzzell v. WillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  5. Post v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. GoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Durband v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Sullivan v. TownsendArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gilbert v. PlowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Nelson v. TracySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API