Flynn v. Jordal
Supreme Court of Iowa
’Appeal from Winnebago District Court.— Hon. C. H. Kelly, J udge. Action for commission alleged to have been earned in finding a purchaser for land. Judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff was to receive a commission of $1 per acre for finding a purchaser of the defendant’s farm in Minnesota. On the 23d day of August, 1901, he induced William and Frank Schultz to sign a contract agreeing to purchase the land at the price proposed, paying $10 in cash and promising to pay “ $500 on or before October 1, 1901, balance of equity due Ed Jordal, to be paid on or before March 1, 1902.” They were to assume the incumbrance on the land, and Jordal to furnish an abstract showing clear title, save the incumbrance, and “ to execute and deliver to William Schultz and Frank…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Love v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Kalley v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Iselin v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Pearson v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Carter v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Mullenger v. ClauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Nagl v. SmallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Reynor v. MackrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Watters v. DanceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.