Legal Opinion

Iselin v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from O’Brien District Court. Action to recover compensation for negotiating tbe sale of two tracts of land. The cause was sent to a referee, and, upon his report, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The petition alleges that defendant, by an oral contract, employed plaintiffs to negotiate the sale of certain land. By the terms of the contract, plaintiffs “were to find a purchaser, or endeavor so to do,” and were to receive as compensation whatever the land sold for above $6.50 per acre. It is alleged that plaintiffs “did find a purchaser” for the land at the price of $9 per acre, “who were ready and willing to pay, and offered to pay that price in cash” for the land, and that defendant was notified thereof, and plaintiffs requested him to execute a deed to the purchaser, which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  3. Hart v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Cook v. KroemekeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Blodgett v. Sioux City & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Fairly v. Wappoo MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  4. Flynn v. JordalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Jordan v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API