Legal Opinion

State v. Hand

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1910No. 16,071PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the district court^for Otoe county: Harvey I). Travis, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

Tlie defendants were informed against by the county attorney of Otoe county for tlie crime of fornication. There was a trial to the court without a jury upon a stipulation of facts. Tlie court found the defendants not guilty, and ordered that they be discharged. Thereupon the county attorney, by leave of court, under the provisions of section 483 of the criminal code, filed his petition in error in this court, alleging that the finding and judgment of the court beloAv “in acquitting and discharging the said defendants was contrary to law.” From the stipulation of facts it appears that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Norman v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hills v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ex parte SuzannaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
  3. Staley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Horton v. HortonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Goodwin v. GoodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API