Legal Opinion

Garber v. Menendez

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 18, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01214Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Marshall Garber, ) CASE NO. 1:17 CV 1214 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN ) Vs. ) ) Heriberto Menendez, ) Memorandum of Opinion and Order ) Defendant. ) INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Defendant Heriberto Menendez, M.D. (Doc. 43). This is a malpractice action. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED. FACTS For purposes of this motion, the facts of the case are largely undisputed. Plaintiff Marshall Garber brings lawsuit against defendant Dr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API