Legal Opinion

Abed v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 17, 1996No. 14782PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The petitioner appeals from the habeas court’s granting of the respondent’s motion to quash and the dismissal of his habeas petition, claiming that the habeas court improperly concluded that (1) the prospective denial of good time credits does not deprive the petitioner of a liberty interest in his monthly accrual of good time credits, (2) the denial of statutory good time credits in this case did not constitute an improper prospective denial, and (3) the denial of good time credits was not prohibited by the ex post facto *178provisions of the United States and Connecticut constitutions. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Luken v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Bulger v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Geraghty v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Ralph Abed v. John J. Armstrong, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Green v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Blyther v. NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API