People v. Plumeyer
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Sidney N. Reeve, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Davis, Rush & MacDonald, Alfred F. MacDonald, William B. Beirne and S. W. Thompson for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant was charged in an indictment of the grand jury in case No. 783 with having committed the crime denounced by section 288 of the Penal Code. The indictment contained two counts, charging separate offenses. By an information of the district attorney like charges were made in two counts, as is shown in case No. 784. The trial of the charges contained in both the indictment and information was, by agreement between the people and the defendant, had before one jury, which jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty upon all counts. The judgments of the court and orders denying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. Quon FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Kern County Finance Co. v. IriartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946