People v. Quon Foo
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The defendants were convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to imprisonment for life. They appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. It is not necessary to state the testimony. [1] The fact that some of the witnesses for the people had been witnesses at the coroner’s inquest and at the preliminary examination, and had there given testimony conflicting with their testimony at the later trial, might have affected their credibility but did not affect the right of the jury to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BorenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BrunoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. SaddlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. LavenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.