Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1923No. Crim. No. 686PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the murder of one .Felix Rolden and was convicted of manslaughter. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The facts hereinafter stated, except as otherwise indicated, are gathered from the testimony of witnesses for the prosecution.

The homicide occurred at the Terminal Hotel, situated a mile south of Oroville, on the twenty-second day of October, 1922. About a month prior thereto the defendant, his wife, and a man named Bilboa went to this hotel together, the defendant and his wife staying there for two days…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. KiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. SimeoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. GuastiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Pueblo v. de Jesús SantanaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API