Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Hoge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1945No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 43,010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Luther Coleman, plaintiff, recovered a judgment against Charles Babcock. On August 4, 1942, the sheriff made a levy on lot 86 of the Mary L. Harris subdivision No. 1, et cetera, Wayne County, Michigan. Levy was made also on lot 84 of the same subdivision. At the time, the record title to lot 86 stood in the name of Babcock, the judgment debtor.- On October 12, 1942, the property was offered for sale by the sheriff and purchased by Luther Coleman, plaintiff herein. On January 24, 1944, the sheriff issued a deed for lot 86 to plaintiff. It was recorded very shortly thereafter. Lot 86 adjoins…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tate v. Pensacola, Gulf, Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Corey v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. American Cedar & Lumber Co. v. GustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Fraser v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Miner v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kastle v. ClemonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Robbins v. Lenz (In Re Perrin's Marine Sales, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API