Legal Opinion

Corey v. Smalley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1895PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Kinne, J., presiding. Bill by Lorenzo Corey against Herbert Smalley and another to enjoin an execution sale. Complainant. appeals from a decree dismissing his bill.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Berlin, being the owner of the premises in controversy, sold the same upon land contract to Charlton on June 23, 1891, for $3,500. Charlton took immediate possession, and continued in possession until December 4, 1891, when he rented the premises to Andrioh, who took immediate possession: On February 8 or 9, 1892, Charlton assigned his contract to Corey. Andrich continued in possession as tenant of Charlton and Corey until October, 1892. By arrangement with Charlton, he paid some, if not all, of his rent by selling groceries to Berlin, for which Charlton was to have credit. On December 14,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ladue v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Stevens v. CastelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Russell v. SweezeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Moore v. Township of KenockeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bowen v. LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Phillis v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Graves v. American Acceptance Mortgage Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kastle v. ClemonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API