State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendant seeks further review of an order of the Court of Appeals denying his motion, pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.02, subd. 4(3), 1 for an extension of time to file his appeal from judgment of conviction of second-degree murder. The Court of Appeals concluded that it did not have authority to grant the extension. In reaching this conclusion, the court reasoned that the defendant’s appeal was a sentencing appeal because it raised only a sentencing issue and that the extension provision of Rule 28.02, subd. 4(3), does not apply to such an appeal. 2 We grant the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HerbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WhitledgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. VikerasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988