Legal Opinion
State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 7, 1995No. C6-95-167PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 11 (1995)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Angelo SCOTT, Appellant.
No. C6-95-167.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 7, 1995.
Review Denied March 14, 1995.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas D. Hayes, Sherburne County Atty., Nancy J. Logering, Asst. County Atty., Elk River, for respondent.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Evan W. Jones, Asst. State Public Defender, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Considered at Special Term and decided by SIMONETT, C.J., and DAVIES and AMUNDSON, JJ.
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
This is a motion to accept…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. StutelbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Certified Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.C. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. VerdonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. VerscheldeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. ChakerianNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.