Legal Opinion

Stanislaus County v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 7, 1964No. Civ. No. 8471PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, Stanislaus County and Stanislaus County Chamber of Commercé, have brought this action against defendants United States and Interstate Commerce Commission to set aside and annul an order of the I.C.C. entered in the proceeding entitled Stanislaus County, et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al., I.C.C. Docket No. 31901 (315 I.C.C. 459). On appropriate motion the defendant railroads were granted permission to intervene.

Jurisdiction over this action is conferred by Title 28 U.S.C. § 1336. A three-judge court was convened pursuant to Title…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
  2. Chamber of Commerce v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1967
  3. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1972
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API