Legal Opinion

Columbus Automotive Corporation v. Oldberg Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1968No. 9500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-Appellant Columbus Automotive Corporation sued Defendant-Appellee Oldberg Manufacturing' Company for a declaratory judgment decreeing that, by virtue of a 1962 letter agreement with Heckethorn Manufacturing and Supply Company (Oldberg’s corporate predecessor), Columbus was entitled to a one percent royalty on the sale of two-tube automotive shock absorbers. Columbus also sought an accounting for the accrued royalties and a judgment for the amount shown by the accounting to be due. In a written opinion Judge Doyle sustained Oldberg’s affirmative defense of patent misuse and dismissed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbus Automotive Corp. v. Oldberg Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County Materials Corp. v. Allan Block Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Glen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Yuma Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
  4. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. LoweyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Chandler v. STERN DENTAL LABORATORY COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API